Background of OSHA’s ETS
Previously, OSHA had announced on November 4 an ETS requiring employers with over 100 workers to institute a COVID-19 vaccination policy. Subsequently, on November 6, the Fifth Circuit temporarily stayed the ETS. The decision came in response to a petition filed by several special interest groups, businesses, and individual states. In addition, the court cited “grave statutory and constitutional issues” Involving the ETS.Overview of the Ruling
Overall, the court stated that the ETS is “both overinclusive … and underinclusive.” In other words, the court ruled the ETS doesn’t account for varying levels of COVID-19 exposure as a sweeping mandate. Simultaneously, it doesn’t attempt to shield employees with 99 or fewer coworkers from the same exposure. In essence, the court ruled that OSHA’s vaccine ETS does not constitute a “delicate exercise” of an “extraordinary power” under Section 6 of the OSH Act. Additionally, the court cited “grave danger” and “necessary” clauses within the OSH Act in its determination to enjoin OSHA from enforcing the vaccine mandate. In brief, Section 6 of the OSH Act states that an ETS must determine two things. Namely, that:- Employees are exposed to grave danger from substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful.
- Such an emergency standard is necessary to protect employees from such danger.