This website and our authorized third-party service providers use cookies to achieve the purposes described in our Privacy Policy. If you would like to learn more or withdraw your consent to some or all cookies, please review our Privacy Policy. By selecting “I ACCEPT” on this banner, scrolling this page, clicking any link, or continuing to browse this site, you agree to the use of cookies.
One of the Google Alerts to which I subscribe is "health care reform," which seems to offer the liveliest discussion of late of any topic I subscribe to.
For obvious reasons, of course, what with our incoming president putting health care on the top burner (right below economic stimulus, I would imagine).
Everyone in what I read seems focused on how to maintain the current system of private insurers and private medical practitoners while somehow incorporating another 47 million people into the ranks of the insured.
However, as students at the Harvard Business School pointed out in their blog, where are the doctors going to come from to handle these millions? They describe how, even in their home state of Massachusetts, getting everybody insured is not the same thing as getting everyone in front of a doctor. The American Medical Association (AMA), they note, paints the current physician shortage in the U.S. at between 35,000 and 40,000 practitioners.
That's number one.
Number two is even more interesting, and it concerns the medical delivery system itself. I'd never really thought about this aspect before, until I read an article in the Anchorage Daily News. In that article, Dr. Doug Eby, a senior administrator with the Southcentral Foundation, which runs a medical center in Anchorage for native Americans, compares the current system to car repair: Come in, be diagnosed, get your fix (pill or procedure), and get out of my face until you break down again.
In reforms carried out by Southcentral at its Alaska Native Medical Center, Eby and others have changed the whole focus, so that patients are now considered "customer-owners," and they don't necessarily see a physician for every complaint or symptom. They see whomever is most helpful and attuned to their situation. For instance, people with diabetes (after the diagnosis by a doctor) will work with a nutritionist and perhaps a behavioral counselor or other people who can set up a diet-and-exercise program and then monitor it to ensure its success.
Also, everything is contained within the one facility, so that customer-cowners can walk from the nurse's or doctor's station over to the x-ray room or blood lab. Everything gets done at once.
The results have been fairly stunning. In the ten years since the Alaska Native Medical Center has adopted this new delivery system, emergency room and urgent care visits are down by 40 percent, specialist visits by 50 percent, and hospital days by 30 percent.
Efficiency and a more holistic approach seem to be paying dividends (although no one mentioned any proof that people are healthier or that the mortality rate is down).
I think Dr. Eby and his colleagues are onto something big here since a lot of what ails us we bring upon ourselves by unhealthy life choices (smoking, eating too much and too much of the wrong things, not exercising, and the list goes on).
Maybe number two--changing our approach--will mitigate number one, a shortage of doctors.
Somehow, however, I can't see the politicians in Wsahington, D.C., being anywhere near smart enough or caring enough to consider something like this. They'll do whatever gets them the most votes, and then drop the whole system on a bunch of bureaucrats to run.
Business as usual in the nation's capital and in medical centers everywhere. The lines and the waits will just be longer, much longer.
Practical articles on HR, Safety, compliance, and people operations—written for real businesses, not legal textbooks.
U.S. Department of Labor Officially Restores Prior Overtime Exemption Rules
On May 14th, 2026, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced it has officially rescinded the 2024 overtime exemption rules. Specifically, the WHD published a technical amendment to restore previous 2019 regulations that dictated overtime exemptions for...
NLRB General Counsel Takes Action to Tackle Current Case Backlog
On May 6th, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and NLRB General Counsel Crystal Stowe Carey announced the bulk transfer of thousands of labor practice cases. Specifically, this action fulfills an initiative signed by the NLRB General Counsel earlier this year. Overall, the initiative...
Privacy Agency Invites Comments from Businesses on the CCPA’s Usage of Personal Data
Recently, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) issued a call for comments on the current state of personal data collection under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Specifically, the invitation to deliver remarks was issued on April 20th, 2026. The information provided by the...
DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule To Unify Standards Under Federal Labor Laws
In April 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a proposed rule to establish a single, clear standard for determining when joint-employer status applies under three major federal laws: the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Migrant and Seasonal...
DOL Updates Enforcement Approach for Employee Benefit Plans: What Employers Should Know
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced a significant change in its enforcement of employee benefit plan rules. The DOL will now focus more closely on serious violations that harm workers and retirees, meaning compliant employers may face less scrutiny under the updated approach.