This website and our authorized third-party service providers use cookies to achieve the purposes described in our Privacy Policy. If you would like to learn more or withdraw your consent to some or all cookies, please review our Privacy Policy. By selecting “I ACCEPT” on this banner, scrolling this page, clicking any link, or continuing to browse this site, you agree to the use of cookies.
After a California judge blocked it in 13 western states, a federal judge in Philadelphia on Monday put the full kibosh on the slated implementation of the Trump administration's new contraceptive rule for Obamacare, which would allow businesses to opt out of the act's birth control requirement based on "moral convictions."
The Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare), which mandates free birth control as part of any health insurance policy, already made provision for religious groups to opt out of the requirement, but the Trump rule would extend the opt-out privilege to those businesses that found contraception morally objectionable.
U.S. District Judge Wendy Bettlestone ruled that the regulation -- slated to go into effect the same day -- would deprive up to 127,000 women of their access to no-cost contraceptives, while at the same time shifting the financial burden to the states to fill in the void.
"The negative effects of even a short period of decreased access to no-cost contraceptive services are irreversible," Beetlestone said.
In defending the rule, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said in court documents that the new rule defended "a narrow class of sincere religious and moral objectors" and stopped them from conducting practices "that conflict with their beliefs."
The case upon which the judge ruled was filed by the attorneys general of Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The judges in both the California and Pennsylvania rulings were appointed by President Obama. Neither judge's rule places a permanent injunction on the regulation, but stops it from going into effect while legal challenges are pursued.
Practical articles on HR, Safety, compliance, and people operations—written for real businesses, not legal textbooks.
U.S. Department of Labor Officially Restores Prior Overtime Exemption Rules
On May 14th, 2026, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced it has officially rescinded the 2024 overtime exemption rules. Specifically, the WHD published a technical amendment to restore previous 2019 regulations that dictated overtime exemptions for...
NLRB General Counsel Takes Action to Tackle Current Case Backlog
On May 6th, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and NLRB General Counsel Crystal Stowe Carey announced the bulk transfer of thousands of labor practice cases. Specifically, this action fulfills an initiative signed by the NLRB General Counsel earlier this year. Overall, the initiative...
Privacy Agency Invites Comments from Businesses on the CCPA’s Usage of Personal Data
Recently, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) issued a call for comments on the current state of personal data collection under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Specifically, the invitation to deliver remarks was issued on April 20th, 2026. The information provided by the...
DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule To Unify Standards Under Federal Labor Laws
In April 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a proposed rule to establish a single, clear standard for determining when joint-employer status applies under three major federal laws: the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Migrant and Seasonal...
DOL Updates Enforcement Approach for Employee Benefit Plans: What Employers Should Know
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced a significant change in its enforcement of employee benefit plan rules. The DOL will now focus more closely on serious violations that harm workers and retirees, meaning compliant employers may face less scrutiny under the updated approach.