This website and our authorized third-party service providers use cookies to achieve the purposes described in our Privacy Policy. If you would like to learn more or withdraw your consent to some or all cookies, please review our Privacy Policy. By selecting “I ACCEPT” on this banner, scrolling this page, clicking any link, or continuing to browse this site, you agree to the use of cookies.
I'm still not clear on the difference between EMRs (electronic medical records) and EHRs (electronic health records), but now we have PHRs (personal health records). At least PHRs I think I understand.
Back to the first two: I've read where there's no difference between EMRs and EHRs except that EHR is designed to be more marketing friendly for some reason. I've also read where EMRs are patients' electronic records maintained at one location while EHRs are shared electronic records available across a network.
Whatever the case may be, the stimulus package from our lawmakers includes a bundle of dough to implement EMRs and/or EHRs. (Could this be like Betamax v. VHS or Blu-Ray v. HD-DVD?)
However the stimulus package implementation turns out, and we won't know for years, PHRs are available right now on both Google and MSN. A personal health record is something that the individual chooses to create on one of those providers (I think WebMD offers PHRs as well).
Security issues aside, people have expressed fears that these providers might sell your data to pharmaceutical and other health marketing companies. Google denies this, if you trust what Google says.
Still, this is pretty exciting when you factor in IBM's development of Continua-compatible software, which you can use to upload your vital data to your PHR, where your physician can access it and make recommendations. Already, a pulse oximeter is available (whatever that is), and future devices will measure blood pressure, glucose levels, temperature, weight and so on. In other words, instead of going in for a physical, you can update your data and have your doctor analyze it.
Now, the question is--will physicians go along with this since they can't charge for an office consultation if you don't come in person? I doubt it unless the rules are changed so they can charge for e-visits.
Wouldn't it be great to sit at work, take your uploadable blood pressure, and sit back and wait for your doctor to call and say, "I think we need to change your Lisinopril level." Sure beats taking a morning off and waiting around two hours for your doctor to get to you.
Practical articles on HR, Safety, compliance, and people operations—written for real businesses, not legal textbooks.
U.S. Department of Labor Officially Restores Prior Overtime Exemption Rules
On May 14th, 2026, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced it has officially rescinded the 2024 overtime exemption rules. Specifically, the WHD published a technical amendment to restore previous 2019 regulations that dictated overtime exemptions for...
NLRB General Counsel Takes Action to Tackle Current Case Backlog
On May 6th, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and NLRB General Counsel Crystal Stowe Carey announced the bulk transfer of thousands of labor practice cases. Specifically, this action fulfills an initiative signed by the NLRB General Counsel earlier this year. Overall, the initiative...
Privacy Agency Invites Comments from Businesses on the CCPA’s Usage of Personal Data
Recently, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) issued a call for comments on the current state of personal data collection under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Specifically, the invitation to deliver remarks was issued on April 20th, 2026. The information provided by the...
DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule To Unify Standards Under Federal Labor Laws
In April 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a proposed rule to establish a single, clear standard for determining when joint-employer status applies under three major federal laws: the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Migrant and Seasonal...
DOL Updates Enforcement Approach for Employee Benefit Plans: What Employers Should Know
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced a significant change in its enforcement of employee benefit plan rules. The DOL will now focus more closely on serious violations that harm workers and retirees, meaning compliant employers may face less scrutiny under the updated approach.