This website and our authorized third-party service providers use cookies to achieve the purposes described in our Privacy Policy. If you would like to learn more or withdraw your consent to some or all cookies, please review our Privacy Policy. By selecting “I ACCEPT” on this banner, scrolling this page, clicking any link, or continuing to browse this site, you agree to the use of cookies.
On May 10th, 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) clarified the agency’s stance on sex discrimination prohibitions. Specifically, the notification that was released deals with discrimination “on the basis of sex” under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Namely, the ACA will again include gender identity and transgender patient protections from discrimination by covered entities. This announcement is the latest in a series of changes that the HHS is considering for this year. For example, in March, the HHS extended the comment period for a proposed HIPAA Privacy Rule change.
Background on the ACA and Sex Discrimination
Section 1557 of the ACA prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, disability, age, and sex in health programs. In other words, Section 1557 covers any health programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. Many of the prohibitions within Section 1557 come from current civil rights laws. Similarly, in January 2021, President Joseph R. Biden signed Executive Order (EO) 13988 into law. That EO expanded sex discrimination prohibitions under civil rights laws Title VII and Title IX.
Originally in 2010, Section 1557 included prohibitions on discrimination based on gender identity. However, President Donald J. Trump’s administration challenged the law in 2016. Consequently, in 2019, the HHS issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) about Section 1557. The NPR led to a final rule in June 2020, removing health care protections based on gender identity. The reasoning was that the original language stretched “the plain meaning of the underlying civil rights statutes” too far.
Bostock vs. Clayton County
Before the HHS issued its 2020 final rule, the Supreme Court (Court) issued a ruling in Bostock vs. Clayton County. The Court held that sex discrimination under Title VII includes sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination. In the recent release, the HHS cited Bostock when it explained the updates to Section 1557. Specifically, the agency will again enforce sex discrimination prohibitions under the ACA to include sexual orientation and gender identity. However, from now on, the HHS is expected to enforce Section 1557 more consistently based on the Bostock decision.
Practical articles on HR, Safety, compliance, and people operations—written for real businesses, not legal textbooks.
U.S. Department of Labor Officially Restores Prior Overtime Exemption Rules
On May 14th, 2026, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced it has officially rescinded the 2024 overtime exemption rules. Specifically, the WHD published a technical amendment to restore previous 2019 regulations that dictated overtime exemptions for...
NLRB General Counsel Takes Action to Tackle Current Case Backlog
On May 6th, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and NLRB General Counsel Crystal Stowe Carey announced the bulk transfer of thousands of labor practice cases. Specifically, this action fulfills an initiative signed by the NLRB General Counsel earlier this year. Overall, the initiative...
Privacy Agency Invites Comments from Businesses on the CCPA’s Usage of Personal Data
Recently, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) issued a call for comments on the current state of personal data collection under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Specifically, the invitation to deliver remarks was issued on April 20th, 2026. The information provided by the...
DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule To Unify Standards Under Federal Labor Laws
In April 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a proposed rule to establish a single, clear standard for determining when joint-employer status applies under three major federal laws: the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Migrant and Seasonal...
DOL Updates Enforcement Approach for Employee Benefit Plans: What Employers Should Know
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced a significant change in its enforcement of employee benefit plan rules. The DOL will now focus more closely on serious violations that harm workers and retirees, meaning compliant employers may face less scrutiny under the updated approach.