This website and our authorized third-party service providers use cookies to achieve the purposes described in our Privacy Policy. If you would like to learn more or withdraw your consent to some or all cookies, please review our Privacy Policy. By selecting “I ACCEPT” on this banner, scrolling this page, clicking any link, or continuing to browse this site, you agree to the use of cookies.
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, now known as COBRA, contains a clause allowing employees to keep their company's health insurance for up to 18 months after they leave their jobs, provided they pay the premiums.
With people being laid off right and left and the ranks of the unemployed rapidly swelling, many Americans are getting their first introduction to COBRA--and they don't like it. It ain't cheap; it's the whole enchilada, not just the small portion of the premium they may have paid at work.
In nine states, monthly unemployment benefits barely cover or don't cover the premium for COBRA. They are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and West Virginia.
Nationally, COBRA costs on average gobble up 84 percent of monthly unemployment checks for families (more than 30 percent for individuals). Factor out the nine states already mentioned, and the average is still 75 percent for the remaining 41 states for family coverage.
Now, I know what many people are going to conclude from these stats--nationalize health care! Granted, that would start to alleviate the situation, but under none of the proposals now floating in Washington, D.C., would the individual or his or her employer not have to pay (substantially) for the "right" to health insurance.
And if the system works anything like the health care delivery platforms in Canada and France, for instance, you'd have to buy supplemental insurance to cover things like, well, operations beyond the tonsil removal variety--to say nothing of enduring long waits for doctor visits, tests and hospitalization, sometimes stretching out to months and even years in Canada.
"We've got to cut your tumor out immediately, Bob, or you'll not make it another six months," the Canadian doctor explains.
"Great, let's get it done," Bob replies quite naturally.
Doctor: "Unfortunately, there are no hospital openings for 18 months."
That kind of thing.
The one time I got laid off, I received the COBRA notice in the mail and immediately knew I couldn't pay the premium. It was just under $2,000 a month for my family. I could pay the premium and lose my house or stay in my house and worry about everyone's health needs. I stayed in the house, and fortunately nothing happened. (However, I did learn how to buy my medications from Canada, which in many cases is still cheaper than paying the co-pay here!)
That's why I compare COBRA to the snake of the same name--it'll bite you.
Maybe those long lines and waits are better, but I'm hoping there's a still better solution.
Practical articles on HR, Safety, compliance, and people operations—written for real businesses, not legal textbooks.
U.S. Department of Labor Officially Restores Prior Overtime Exemption Rules
On May 14th, 2026, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced it has officially rescinded the 2024 overtime exemption rules. Specifically, the WHD published a technical amendment to restore previous 2019 regulations that dictated overtime exemptions for...
NLRB General Counsel Takes Action to Tackle Current Case Backlog
On May 6th, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and NLRB General Counsel Crystal Stowe Carey announced the bulk transfer of thousands of labor practice cases. Specifically, this action fulfills an initiative signed by the NLRB General Counsel earlier this year. Overall, the initiative...
Privacy Agency Invites Comments from Businesses on the CCPA’s Usage of Personal Data
Recently, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) issued a call for comments on the current state of personal data collection under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Specifically, the invitation to deliver remarks was issued on April 20th, 2026. The information provided by the...
DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule To Unify Standards Under Federal Labor Laws
In April 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a proposed rule to establish a single, clear standard for determining when joint-employer status applies under three major federal laws: the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Migrant and Seasonal...
DOL Updates Enforcement Approach for Employee Benefit Plans: What Employers Should Know
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced a significant change in its enforcement of employee benefit plan rules. The DOL will now focus more closely on serious violations that harm workers and retirees, meaning compliant employers may face less scrutiny under the updated approach.