This website and our authorized third-party service providers use cookies to achieve the purposes described in our Privacy Policy. If you would like to learn more or withdraw your consent to some or all cookies, please review our Privacy Policy. By selecting “I ACCEPT” on this banner, scrolling this page, clicking any link, or continuing to browse this site, you agree to the use of cookies.
Funding for the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which provides coverage for some 9 million children nationwide, expired at the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30 and is now facing an uncertain renewal future. Though the Senate Finance Committee approved a bill providing $100 billion over five years, the House Energy and Commerce Committee approved a bill that Democrats complained would take money from Medicare and the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
The House bill, approved on a party-line vote, would require those on Medicare who earn more than $500,000 a year to pay a higher monthly premium, and it would allow states to curtail Medicaid services for those who win the lottery. High earners already pay about $400 a month for Medicare, but the bill would tack on another $135 monthly.
“Folks that earn a half-million dollars a year and are over 65, they can pay a little bit more for Medicare,” said Rep. Fred Upton (R.-Mich.). “And you know what? If they don’t want to pay, they don’t have to enroll. That’s a choice they will have.”
Countered Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D.-Ill.): The GOP bill is “a first step in eroding a social insurance program, Medicare, that has for many years been in the cross-hairs of the Republican Party.”
The Senate version left unsaid where the money would come from, and at least one Senator, Patrick Toomey (R.-Pa.), complained that $100 billion is “a number that’s wildly in excess of what anyone thinks could plausibly happen. It is completely dishonest budgeting.”
Participating states still have funds to operate the program, though some say they will run out of money by the end of the year, others by next spring, if funding is not restored.
The bickering, said Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. (D.-N.J.) , "will likely mean more delay and possibly no action in Congress until the end of the year as part of an omnibus appropriations bill."
Practical articles on HR, Safety, compliance, and people operations—written for real businesses, not legal textbooks.
U.S. Department of Labor Officially Restores Prior Overtime Exemption Rules
On May 14th, 2026, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced it has officially rescinded the 2024 overtime exemption rules. Specifically, the WHD published a technical amendment to restore previous 2019 regulations that dictated overtime exemptions for...
NLRB General Counsel Takes Action to Tackle Current Case Backlog
On May 6th, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and NLRB General Counsel Crystal Stowe Carey announced the bulk transfer of thousands of labor practice cases. Specifically, this action fulfills an initiative signed by the NLRB General Counsel earlier this year. Overall, the initiative...
Privacy Agency Invites Comments from Businesses on the CCPA’s Usage of Personal Data
Recently, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) issued a call for comments on the current state of personal data collection under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Specifically, the invitation to deliver remarks was issued on April 20th, 2026. The information provided by the...
DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule To Unify Standards Under Federal Labor Laws
In April 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a proposed rule to establish a single, clear standard for determining when joint-employer status applies under three major federal laws: the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Migrant and Seasonal...
DOL Updates Enforcement Approach for Employee Benefit Plans: What Employers Should Know
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced a significant change in its enforcement of employee benefit plan rules. The DOL will now focus more closely on serious violations that harm workers and retirees, meaning compliant employers may face less scrutiny under the updated approach.